Yes I have said it in previous post the guys at MS are thinking of the long game. So all they have to do is survive at this point. They don't need to blow us away. We are spoilt enough as it is already with people who stll have a backlog of games dating back to ps2 days lol.lestat wrote:With what MS has shown us in terms of BC and the way the one X was done, I reckon will we see new hardware released from them every 3 years, to ensure they offer the best console gaming experience. That was the whole point of moving to more commodity x86 hardware. It will be interesting to see if sony offer BC on PS5, they seem very quiet on the subject, MS on the other hand we know are committed to keeping your library alive and even improving your old games.
https://www.thurrott.com/xbox/161232/mi ... rrive-2020" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Guessing they will probably offer 2 skus, one will be a lower cost die shrunk version of the one X, scarlet will be the early adopter enthusiast 12-14TF(ryzen/navi) system. Developers can optionally drop support for the original xbox one.Microsoft is planning for the next Xbox console release to arrive in 2020. But what is more interesting, is that Microsoft describes ‘Scarlett’ as a family of devices; meaning we may see multiple pieces of hardware released that year.
What current game developers need to do though, regardless of what the future is going to be is listen to this guy:
Cyber punk will probably be amazing but CDPR are still shit at combat compared to Dark Souls, monster hunter, Zelda BOTW, Bloodbourne etc And no amount of Candy Saying it's the GOTG is going to change this. Where there is room for improvement then the current game companies can address this and improve. Nothing we true gamers are saying is unreasonable stuff. Microsoft should attempt to do what sony was doing when they attempted to do a Monster Hunter clone and see if they can learn from the better third party releases and make their own franchises that make for decent alternatives to what we have on the other systems. Eg sony had their own smash bros clone, MH clone, and then MS got Tomb Raider which was a Uncharted clone. That's how you win man. You get inspired by what works, refine it and improve upon the solid base and eventually outdo the competition. MS have the tech but they need to go back to the days when original Xbox was out and bungie were kicking butt with halo 1 and they offered things that were exclusive to the platform.
Then a fanbase develops and people buy their machines not just for tech reasons but for content reason. (so even if they decide to make an underpowered machine one time, people will at least be drawn to upgrading for the titles available on it)
My problem is they forgot how important brand image is. When you cancel platinum title Scalebound, it is a sign you have no confidence in yourself and are insecure. That led to pissed off xbox fans who see it as time to jump off the ship. It would be like nintendo canceling bayonetta or something like that. It hurt their image. They should have the enthusiasm that they are gamers too, not just businessmen trying to make money from gaming industry. The middle class guy doesn't just buy shit to show off to his neighbours that he has something better than them as a sign of status. That's just one part of it where a tech demo can demonstrate differences between the last machine and the current machine's abilities. The middle class guy wants to know whether you actually know what the customer wants and that you won't do a 180 and lie about shit. A lot of the confidence MS built up from 360 days has eroded now so they got to look at what people like about Xbox branded console system and then gain trust again. You do this by looking at how you can counter the offerings from sony who is in the lead. Just as nintendo had to compete with Vita using 3DS over the years by trying to focus a lot of attention on content. (it's a weaker system than vita and was able to survive on brand image/trust - this is important lesson for MS to learn)