Devil May Cry 4 first screens.

lestat · Post by **lestat** » 08 Sep 2006 11:10 am

official website is live too.

http://www.capcom.co.jp/devil4/main.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Arthas · Post by **Arthas** » 08 Sep 2006 11:57 am

Looks tight, nothing that blows me away but very nice none the less. Actually I could sum this generation (xbox360) up like that from what ive seen so far

GreyWizzard · Post by **GreyWizzard** » 08 Sep 2006 12:04 pm

Capcom - we make pretty games.

AgOnNy · Post by **AgOnNy** » 08 Sep 2006 12:23 pm

360 is capable of that easily... would be great if they ported it.

Seraph · Post by **Seraph** » 08 Sep 2006 12:33 pm

Is this for 360 or PS3? I need to know before I can say whether it looks good or crappy.

Talez · Post by **Talez** » 08 Sep 2006 12:34 pm

Sonic Jam · Post by **Sonic Jam** » 08 Sep 2006 12:34 pm

This game is confirmed to be 60fps, I don't think any hardware that exists right now is capable of that "easily"

Very impressive, wonder if it's running on the Capcom engine they talked about or a stand alone system (since they claime they havn't ported it from 360>ps3 yet, but it would make sense for them to do so..).

lestat · Post by **lestat** » 08 Sep 2006 12:38 pm

This game is confirmed to be 60fps, I don't think any hardware that exists right now is capable of that "easily"

It's easy when you don't use any next gen effects, which is clearly apparent in those screen shots.

For christ sakes look at the spikes on the roof, they're not even polygons, they're alpha'd textures. Screens look underwhelming to me.

Madmya · Post by **Madmya** » 08 Sep 2006 03:01 pm

so is it for ps3 or 360?

Ben · Post by **Ben** » 08 Sep 2006 03:20 pm

PS3 is all I see listed on the website, every other incarnation was Playstation based though so I wouldn't expect much different.

Talez · Post by **Talez** » 08 Sep 2006 03:36 pm

lestat wrote:It's easy when you don't use any next gen effects, which is clearly apparent in those screen shots.

For christ sakes look at the spikes on the roof, they're not even polygons, they're alpha'd textures. Screens look underwhelming to me.

I never knew that alpha polygons make bloom effects and HDR invisible to the naked eye.

I'm pretty sure I could stretch this post to 20 pages worth of "how fanboys process visual information" for a PhD thesis.

lestat · Post by **lestat** » 08 Sep 2006 03:49 pm

bloom is not a next gen effect talez.

But if you got the time to write a thesis, that wiki you asked for is kinda lonely.

mxlegend99 · Post by **mxlegend99** » 08 Sep 2006 06:08 pm

Fuck. That looks awesome. Might be capable on 360, might not. But who gives a shit. This totally fucking owns current gen and i'm assuming these are legitimate in-game shots. In motion it should be even better.

I'd definitely pick this title up when i grab a PS3.

Candy Arse · Post by **Candy Arse** » 08 Sep 2006 06:24 pm

Very underwhelming.

mxlegend99 · Post by **mxlegend99** » 08 Sep 2006 07:00 pm

It's about 3billion times better looking the DMC3 which was an awesome game ruined by shit graphics (on my HDTV the jaggiez were soooo unbearable).

This may not be the BEST looking game. But it looks awesome still. Although those shots aren't full 720p rez