Movies you've seen lately.
-
- V for Thread Derailing
- Posts: 9272
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 12:45 am
- Cletus
- Hates Everyone Equally
- Posts: 15563
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 12:56 am
- Location: Aboard the HMAS Todd Margaret
- Contact:
A Scanner Darkly
I don't know why they bothered cell shading this movie for a start.The only real reson I can think of is the constantly changing "joe everyman" scramble suit that the operatives wear.Other than that,it's basically a movie like any other except that it's cell shaded.It does look impressive but not so impressive that you can actually see the reasoning behind it.Hair really bothered me in this movie.I constantly found myself having to flick the movie back on a lot of scenes and rewatch them due to me being disracted by the unnaturalness of everyone's hair and it's movement.It's almost as if everyone's hair behaves as a seperate entity.It moves indoors in slow creeping waves that just took my attention off the dialogue too many times.And you really need to keep a very close ear on the dialogue for this movie.
As for the plot or story or hard to follow sequence of events that passes for the story,there's enough stuff going on to keep you watching but I wouldn't say there's one "wow" moment in it.Quite frankly,I only vaguely "get it" and even then I'm probably miles from the mark.
Before I finish can I say that as always,Keanu sucks.Almost no role suits this dude.I just don't get it.I've never been able to believe him in anything outside of Bill and Ted and possibly Parenthood in which he plays himself quite honestly in both roles.
The rest of the cast are fine and both Woody Harrelson and Robert Downey Jnr are the stand outs.Rory Cochrane bordered on being a stereotype of someone totally fucked up on drugs in my opinion.I also think the cellshading somewhat detracted from his performance in particular moreso than anyone else in the cast...whereas it makes Winona Ryder look half decent.
It's a mixed bag and yet the circle jerkers are going to lap this shit up calling it art and superb story telling and all that type of shit.
It's ok though.Certainly worth a watch.
7 I'm not watching it again to understand it out of 10
I don't know why they bothered cell shading this movie for a start.The only real reson I can think of is the constantly changing "joe everyman" scramble suit that the operatives wear.Other than that,it's basically a movie like any other except that it's cell shaded.It does look impressive but not so impressive that you can actually see the reasoning behind it.Hair really bothered me in this movie.I constantly found myself having to flick the movie back on a lot of scenes and rewatch them due to me being disracted by the unnaturalness of everyone's hair and it's movement.It's almost as if everyone's hair behaves as a seperate entity.It moves indoors in slow creeping waves that just took my attention off the dialogue too many times.And you really need to keep a very close ear on the dialogue for this movie.
As for the plot or story or hard to follow sequence of events that passes for the story,there's enough stuff going on to keep you watching but I wouldn't say there's one "wow" moment in it.Quite frankly,I only vaguely "get it" and even then I'm probably miles from the mark.
Before I finish can I say that as always,Keanu sucks.Almost no role suits this dude.I just don't get it.I've never been able to believe him in anything outside of Bill and Ted and possibly Parenthood in which he plays himself quite honestly in both roles.
The rest of the cast are fine and both Woody Harrelson and Robert Downey Jnr are the stand outs.Rory Cochrane bordered on being a stereotype of someone totally fucked up on drugs in my opinion.I also think the cellshading somewhat detracted from his performance in particular moreso than anyone else in the cast...whereas it makes Winona Ryder look half decent.
It's a mixed bag and yet the circle jerkers are going to lap this shit up calling it art and superb story telling and all that type of shit.
It's ok though.Certainly worth a watch.
7 I'm not watching it again to understand it out of 10
- edgecrusher
- BLUE!...YOUR MY BOY BLUE!!
- Posts: 2585
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006 04:16 pm
- PSN ID: edgecrush33
- Location: Melbourne
The Departed.
good, but not that good. I'm a huge fan of Infernal Affairs and they did that movie spot on. Script was pretty much the same, Jack Nicholson did an excellent job. I didnt feel that connected to leonardo's character ( as i did to Tony leung's character ) and it felt like his character was a bit rushed, there wasnt enough build up to get to know leonardo a bit better. In the end it just felt like an americanised version of a excellent Hong Kong movie..... If i was going to recommend Infernal Affairs or The Departed?, Infernal Affairs hands down.
good, but not that good. I'm a huge fan of Infernal Affairs and they did that movie spot on. Script was pretty much the same, Jack Nicholson did an excellent job. I didnt feel that connected to leonardo's character ( as i did to Tony leung's character ) and it felt like his character was a bit rushed, there wasnt enough build up to get to know leonardo a bit better. In the end it just felt like an americanised version of a excellent Hong Kong movie..... If i was going to recommend Infernal Affairs or The Departed?, Infernal Affairs hands down.
Everybody be cool.....You be cool
- edgecrusher
- BLUE!...YOUR MY BOY BLUE!!
- Posts: 2585
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006 04:16 pm
- PSN ID: edgecrush33
- Location: Melbourne
- GreyWizzard
- Boundless Generosity
- Posts: 18671
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 07:51 am
- XBL ID: GreyWizzard
- PSN ID: Grey_AU
- Location: Brisbane
- Candy Arse
- Elite Ginger
- Posts: 20292
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 08:41 am
-
- Arse Surgery By Shotgun
- Posts: 965
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 12:39 am
- XBL ID: Juzbuffa1
- Location: Melbourne
Saw III - watched this last night and throught it was a decent enough sequel. Its more of the same from the first two movies and its quite gruesome, I'm really surprised it got away with only an MA rating. Id give it 6.5 minced up pig carcasses out of 10.
Note to Cletus - you'll be pleased to know there is no repeat of the pit of syringes from Saw II.
Note to Cletus - you'll be pleased to know there is no repeat of the pit of syringes from Saw II.
- edgecrusher
- BLUE!...YOUR MY BOY BLUE!!
- Posts: 2585
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006 04:16 pm
- PSN ID: edgecrush33
- Location: Melbourne
-
- V for Thread Derailing
- Posts: 9272
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 12:45 am
Saw III
I loved the first movie. The second one felt kind've tacked on. This one feels like a mix between the two. The 'twist' can be seen some time before it actually happens and isn't as clever as the first movies'. It gets points for gruesomeness.
I give Saw III 6.5 'rotate the locking cylinder's counter-clockwise' moments out of 10.
I loved the first movie. The second one felt kind've tacked on. This one feels like a mix between the two. The 'twist' can be seen some time before it actually happens and isn't as clever as the first movies'. It gets points for gruesomeness.
I give Saw III 6.5 'rotate the locking cylinder's counter-clockwise' moments out of 10.
- MiNiStRy
- Occasionally Overlooks Gravity.
- Posts: 2373
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 09:32 pm
- XBL ID: MiNiStRyS
- PSN ID: MiNiStRy
- Steam ID: MiNiStRyS
- Location: Melbourne
Watched jackass 2 on thursday night, its actually better than the first. There's one bit where they play a joke on a fellow member. They get him to play a terrorist by dressing up and catch a taxi, while telling the driver that he's going to blow up a plane. The drivers in on the whole thing and retaliates by beating the shit out of him and threatening to kill him, he totally shits himself.
One other thing they did while getting him to dress up was have a beard. Well they used all of their own pubic hair without him knowing, and you should of seen him picking the pubes out of his mouth......i just about pissed myself!
Can't wait for jackass 3!
One other thing they did while getting him to dress up was have a beard. Well they used all of their own pubic hair without him knowing, and you should of seen him picking the pubes out of his mouth......i just about pissed myself!
Can't wait for jackass 3!
- edgecrusher
- BLUE!...YOUR MY BOY BLUE!!
- Posts: 2585
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006 04:16 pm
- PSN ID: edgecrush33
- Location: Melbourne
- Candy Arse
- Elite Ginger
- Posts: 20292
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 08:41 am
Flags Of Our Fathers was decent, but that's about it. Some spectacular war scenes, but nothing that hasn't really been done before and the bar was set very high by Saving Private Ryan.
It doesn't really feel like an Eastwood movie as it's hard to connect emotionally with the characters, save for the Indian fella who really was top class. Poor bloke got shat on the entire movie. But the movie feels disjointed in many parts, as well as brilliant, admittedly. The narrative is poorly told, to the point of confusing.
I'd like to think that Letters From Iwo Jima will complete the full story and make Flags seem better, but as a standalone movie it's far from Eastwood's best. 6 eviscerated bodies out of 10.
It doesn't really feel like an Eastwood movie as it's hard to connect emotionally with the characters, save for the Indian fella who really was top class. Poor bloke got shat on the entire movie. But the movie feels disjointed in many parts, as well as brilliant, admittedly. The narrative is poorly told, to the point of confusing.
I'd like to think that Letters From Iwo Jima will complete the full story and make Flags seem better, but as a standalone movie it's far from Eastwood's best. 6 eviscerated bodies out of 10.
[IMG]http://gamercards.exophase.com/106445.png[/IMG]
After seeing the trailer, I can't wait to see Borat's bloody long named movie. Apparently an absolute pisser, primary indications are that it will come close to breaking the U.S. box office record for movies debuting on under 1,000 screens. Apparently, it wasn't tracking well so Fox cut it back from 2,200 screens to 800. Stupid move in hindsight. Comes out 23rd of November here.
Saw Crank.
You have to leave your brains in at the door for this one... definitely mindless entertainment. Nothing wrong with that though. Best way to describe it is if you loved the Transporter movies but wished they had more drug use, swearing and sex scenes, you'll love this. Otherwise leave it.
6/10
You have to leave your brains in at the door for this one... definitely mindless entertainment. Nothing wrong with that though. Best way to describe it is if you loved the Transporter movies but wished they had more drug use, swearing and sex scenes, you'll love this. Otherwise leave it.
6/10
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/amba][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gelsig/black/amba.png[/img][/url]