Wikipedia Vs Colbert Report

Talk about everything but gaming in here!

Moderators: pilonv1, Juzbuffa

Post Reply
Pat

Wikipedia Vs Colbert Report

Post by Pat »

How Truthiness And Wikiality Helped Colbert Take Down Wikipedia

Since The Daily Show has been getting so much love from the tech crowd lately, with their recent discussions on net neutrality, spinoff show The Colbert Report had to really step things up to top its parent show. They did so by going after a topic that would get even more attention among techies: Wikipedia. As plenty of folks have been emailing and submitting, Stephen Colbert decided to take on Wikipedia tonight, and discuss his vision for a new "Wikiality," where the masses create the facts they want to believe in. And did they ever. At the conclusion of the amusing segment, Colbert instructs his audience to find the Wikipedia entry on elephants, and edit it to say that "the number of elephants has tripled in the last six months." Not surprisingly, plenty of people went to either make the edit, or to see if had been made. Sean Feeney quickly wrote in to note that the rush from the Colbert Nation apparently took down the site, giving visitors a message about technical difficulties. Of course, it didn't take long for the folks at Wikipedia to leap into action and lock down 20 elephant related Wikipedia pages (they also claim that the technical problem was unrelated to Colbert-driven traffic, but Colbert is likely to claim otherwise). Of course, for those who are both fans of Stephen Colbert and Wikipedia... who gets the tip of the hat and who gets the wag of the finger?
http://techdirt.com/articles/20060801/0128222.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And the wiki on elephants:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elephants" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:lol:
User avatar
GreyWizzard
Boundless Generosity
Boundless Generosity
Posts: 18671
Joined: 04 Jul 2006 07:51 am
XBL ID: GreyWizzard
PSN ID: Grey_AU
Location: Brisbane

Post by GreyWizzard »

lol
Because of recent vandalism or other disruption, editing of this article by anonymous or newly registered users is disabled (see semi-protection policy). Such users may discuss changes, request unprotection, or create an account.
User avatar
mech
Phase 3: Profit!
Phase 3: Profit!
Posts: 14858
Joined: 04 Jul 2006 09:55 am

Post by mech »

I love how whenever someone tries to "prove" that Wikipedia is bad, the system works and their vandalism is uncovered and stopped.

Colbert was a fucking dick for doing that.
Pat

Post by Pat »

I think its proof that the process can be perverted though. Like any reference source, there are bound to be errors, just more so in wiki since it can be edited maliciously. A few such edits have probably snuck through.

The monitoring must be a bitch of a process though.
User avatar
GreyWizzard
Boundless Generosity
Boundless Generosity
Posts: 18671
Joined: 04 Jul 2006 07:51 am
XBL ID: GreyWizzard
PSN ID: Grey_AU
Location: Brisbane

Post by GreyWizzard »

damnit... George Bush Jr is locked... fiddlesticks!

---edit---

W00T!!!

John Howard isn't!
User avatar
mech
Phase 3: Profit!
Phase 3: Profit!
Posts: 14858
Joined: 04 Jul 2006 09:55 am

Post by mech »

Took them about 3 seconds to remove any vandalism from that page. Seriously, what is the fucking point? It wastes everyone's time.
Pat

Post by Pat »

All in the name of satire ...
User avatar
Twit
Noticeably Unintelligent
Noticeably Unintelligent
Posts: 2877
Joined: 11 Jul 2006 09:50 am
XBL ID: Twit AU
PSN ID: KAKwit
Steam ID: KAKwit

Post by Twit »

See? Anarchy works.
Post Reply