Atheism

BOOMY · Post by **BOOMY** » 04 Sep 2006 08:43 pm

I'm not sure why you're arguing this shit about 'being civil' with me as I couldn't care less. I've already explained the issues atheists have with religious people about that and I don't need to go any further there.

I'm not sure why you gave a shit then? I clarified an assumption made that religious people are stupid.

if you're trying to tell me that religion does not rely on faith

I'm not. I told you it makes sense to have a spritual side of life but also hold scientific principles true. Keep harping on and over assuming though, its getting somewhere logical *smirk*

mech · Post by **mech** » 04 Sep 2006 09:02 pm

My god it's painful reading Boomy's posts. Too many doobies I reckon.

selfish · Post by **selfish** » 07 Sep 2006 12:23 am

wow this thread ended up lame
regardless, i thought this as good a place as any to post this

heh

vision · Post by **vision** » 07 Sep 2006 09:39 am

selfish wrote:wow this thread ended up lame

Lucky you came in and made it awesome again.

BOOMY · Post by **BOOMY** » 07 Sep 2006 02:52 pm

Oh zing! you've been so deadly lately I cant even show my face in this thread.

vision · Post by **vision** » 07 Sep 2006 04:16 pm

Oh, double zing. You're using the wanking emoticon again? How fucking original. Back in your hole you dopey fuck.

selfish · Post by **selfish** » 07 Sep 2006 06:02 pm

Oh, double zing. You're calling someone a dopey fuck again? How fucking original. Back in your hole you negative jerk.

GreyWizzard · Post by **GreyWizzard** » 07 Sep 2006 06:24 pm

so a buddhist walks into a burger joint and says "Make me one with everything"

BOOMY · Post by **BOOMY** » 07 Sep 2006 09:58 pm

No hope for you vision. keep making me look stupid.

GreyWizzard · Post by **GreyWizzard** » 07 Sep 2006 10:55 pm

This nun is asking her class what they would like to be when they grow up...

Nun: What would you like to be when you grow up Sally?

Sally: A prostitute.

Nun: What did you say?

Sally: I said a prostitute.

Nun: Oh thank goodness, for a second there I thought you said a protestant.

vision · Post by **vision** » 08 Sep 2006 02:02 pm

I can just see you two chumps sitting there on msn messaging each other asking for backup. Grow a backbone ffs.

Scullibundo · Post by **Scullibundo** » 08 Sep 2006 02:27 pm

I clicked on this thread and was pleasantly surprised to see people debating intelligently with one another. Luckily you guys came along and put everything back into balance, I was scared there for a second.

Oh and hang on, let me just fill out the next few posts.

Poster 1 says:

Poster 2 says:

Poster 3 says:

Poster 1 retorts:

Poster 2 retorts:

Greywizzard says:

Did you hear the one about the religious figures?

etc.

BOOMY · Post by **BOOMY** » 08 Sep 2006 05:11 pm

Backup, for what? You make it easy enough alone. Keep asking you bro to come in and randomly change the subject though. Its helping.

GreyWizzard · Post by **GreyWizzard** » 08 Sep 2006 05:35 pm

Who are the two chumps? Is that Boomy and Selfish? It's just not clear. I fear I might have been dragged into this somehow. If not cool. Maybe I just hold myself a little too high.

BOOMY · Post by **BOOMY** » 08 Sep 2006 05:42 pm

Well I made a comment directed at mech, vision decided to attack me based on intended misinterpretations he derived from my post. Vision gets owned, mech makes a weak random comment, selfish finally makes an appearance and apparently *I* called him in for backup.

Laughable claims to make from the msn-team of the century, and a weak one at that.

vision · Post by **vision** » 09 Sep 2006 09:04 pm

Yep, I got pwned, even though you're the one who can't keep a decent argument going. Way to answer my points.

BOOMY · Post by **BOOMY** » 10 Sep 2006 06:16 pm

Oh and what points were those? You just trailed off, then returned after your bro bumped this redundantly. Keep accusing me of the things you did more than anyone though.

itch · Post by **itch** » 11 Sep 2006 02:39 am

i like this idea

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/everything.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

mmmmm strings

if it was true (and there's no way of proving that or otherwise, at least for now) then the only real remaining question is who the conducter would be.

Lord God or Allah? i doubt it some how.

maybe

or perhaps

maybe it's a whole BAND.

GreyWizzard · Post by **GreyWizzard** » 16 Sep 2006 11:13 pm

here is an interesting read

http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/GodProof.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

mech · Post by **mech** » 17 Sep 2006 12:39 am

Ahahaha, this sums it all up:

666. ARGUMENT FROM ASSUMPTION
(1) God exists.
(2) Therefore, God exists.

Pat · Post by **Pat** » 17 Sep 2006 05:41 pm

priceless.