184-36 vs 50-0, discuss
- General Chaos
- Beano's Minion
- Posts: 8102
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 08:59 am
- Location: Hobart
- Twiztid Elf
- Team Wowboy
- Posts: 7459
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 05:59 pm
- XBL ID: Koco Savage
- PSN ID: giantenemycrabb
Re: 184-36 vs 50-0, discuss
please don't be Kangaroos please don't be Kangaroos
Checks afl.com.au
/phew.
Checks afl.com.au
/phew.
- pilonv1
- Eels - regular season champions
- Posts: 19049
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 11:08 am
- XBL ID: pilonv1
- PSN ID: pilonv1
- Steam ID: pilonv1
Re: 184-36 vs 50-0, discuss
Eels won this week. If they were given 1 point for missing they would probably have done OK last week
Melbourne will always be shit.
Melbourne will always be shit.
-
- Forum Faggot
- Posts: 19128
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 01:51 am
- XBL ID: Madmya
- Steam ID: Madmya
- Location: Brisbane
Re: 184-36 vs 50-0, discuss
Eels might have won, but they were still terrible. They did everything they could to keep the sharks in it.
- Vince
- Very Regular Member
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: 29 Jul 2006 09:05 am
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia!!!
Re: 184-36 vs 50-0, discuss
Not sure who the 50-0 is for (guessing it's nrl) but that dees/bummers score line is deplorable. They never looked like winning that game the dees. They were atrocious. I remember the fitzroy lions back before they got the boot, and they were really bad, but at least they looked like they were trying. The lions were just a horrible team.
This mob though, wow wee. I mean the scum belted them by 148 points but that's flattering to them cause they really aren't that great. It was the quality (or lack thereof) from the dees which really stood out. The dons were running with no pressure whatsoever all over the field. Even through the middle they were taking the ball with no one around them. Passes into the dons forward 50 were met with no opposition to spoil, and if and when the dees managed to get a hold of the ball they'd either kick it straight to the opposition or just fumble it! I swear I've never seen anything as bad in all of my afl viewing life. Jack watts (even though he isn't the only player that should be singled out) is one reason this team is where it is- he was a quality number 1 draft pick which they pinned so many hopes and dreams onto, yet he looks lazy, tired and uninterested. If I had an opportunity to play afl you think I'd stand around trying to look like ned Kelly and play like a fucking dero?
I can only imagine if real quality opposition had played the dees last night like the hawks or pies... The margin would've blown out to over 200 points.
This mob though, wow wee. I mean the scum belted them by 148 points but that's flattering to them cause they really aren't that great. It was the quality (or lack thereof) from the dees which really stood out. The dons were running with no pressure whatsoever all over the field. Even through the middle they were taking the ball with no one around them. Passes into the dons forward 50 were met with no opposition to spoil, and if and when the dees managed to get a hold of the ball they'd either kick it straight to the opposition or just fumble it! I swear I've never seen anything as bad in all of my afl viewing life. Jack watts (even though he isn't the only player that should be singled out) is one reason this team is where it is- he was a quality number 1 draft pick which they pinned so many hopes and dreams onto, yet he looks lazy, tired and uninterested. If I had an opportunity to play afl you think I'd stand around trying to look like ned Kelly and play like a fucking dero?
I can only imagine if real quality opposition had played the dees last night like the hawks or pies... The margin would've blown out to over 200 points.
- General Chaos
- Beano's Minion
- Posts: 8102
- Joined: 04 Jul 2006 08:59 am
- Location: Hobart
Re: 184-36 vs 50-0, discuss
What I have also learnt is the Eels can beat drug cheats off the back of a flogging and the Demons can double down and let drug cheats humiliate them.
I s'pose that can be one consolation the game will eventually get an * next to it.
I s'pose that can be one consolation the game will eventually get an * next to it.