Madmya wrote:Yes, I can think we are in better form than the Dragons, despite thinking we're not at our best. Did you just magically forget the Eels pumped the Dragons at home? MMmmmm.
Also, I'd take Peter Stirling's opinion over yours every day of the week.
stop.
Lol. What makes you better then them?
Losing more games?
Scoring less points?
Mine isn't an opinion... it is a fact backed up by the NRL ladder.
Dragons have beaten Sharks. Panthers. Warriors... all in convincing manner.
Broncos have beaten Sharks. Raiders... and soon Bulldogs.
Dragons were the better team going into Round 4. That's a fact.
I would say Broncos probably deserve to be above other teams with 2 wins though. But still 5th at best... and thats roughly where they will sit on the ladder
You should be. Youte talking out of your ass trying to make yoyr team seem better than they are.
My 8th placed Broncos are actually the 3rd best team because we have 2 wins over average teams which is somehow more impressive than 3 wins over better teams.
And we are playing the 4 best teams because last year they were the top 4 teams. Nevermind roster changes. Injuries and form 6 months later being different.
Madmya wrote:This must be the first time in NRL history where a team has been given last year's top 4 consecutively, in the first four rounds to boot.
Nothing about them being this year's best four teams you dumb cunt. Jesus fucking christ you're just so fucking stupid it does my head in. (Pep, this is unhinged)
The quality of this match has gone up. Can't believe how much has fallen the Dogs' way the past 10 minutes, Kahu you idiot!
Just because we see Broncos for the average team they are. Your feelings are hurt.
Broncos are shit. Only a dumb cunt would think they are the 3rd best team while sitting in 8th place and struggling to beat the Bulldogs. Whats the excuse this week? Bulldogs had a shorter turnarou d and didnt score any points last week so they have an advantage?
You said you think they are better than Dragons. You are using those power ranking to suggest you are better than the ladder suggests.
I think the wins separating teams are accurate. Only tge for and against isn't. Hence why I think Broncos are the best of teams on 2 wins. Panthers loss to Dragons was disgraceful.. so only way Broncos are worse is if these shitty Dogs beat them.
You fucking stop. You started it... im just enjoying it. More than this boring game... 5 days rest is an advantage. My team with less wins is better because Peter Sterling says they are. Our draw is the hardest because last year those teams with different rosters were the top 4 teams. Blah blah blah.
I came in here to point out the unfair advantage the Bulldogs had tonight by only having 1 less day of rest than the Boncos instead of the usual 3 day advantage that they're used to. But it seems MX has it covered.
Broncos should get the 2 points because Peter Sterling said they are the 3rd best team and his opinion is more important than the results and the ladder.
Sadly the Broncos are disadvantaged with a 7 day turnaround next week against the Roosters. Those lucky bastards get 6 days... only 1 day off the ideal preparation.
mxlegend99 wrote:Broncos should get the 2 points because Peter Sterling said they are the 3rd best team and his opinion is more important than the results and the ladder.
Sadly the Broncos are disadvantaged with a 7 day turnaround next week against the Roosters. Those lucky bastards get 6 days... only 1 day off the ideal preparation.
Yep I was just looking at the draw - another home night game for the Boncos, a rest advantage AGAIN over their opponents for said home game...Roosters by 30, right?
Or do we adjust how much the Roosters win by next week in relation to how many tackles their opposition has to make tonight?
I forget the exact Madmya/Stirlo Broscience Formula but I'm sure it's something like that.
Roosters to win between 10-30 points based on the advantage of being on the road and having less rest than the Boncos. Go put some money on it guys.